All of our ancient ancestors depicted Earth as a flat plane enclosed by a dome.

It wasn't until just the last handful of centuries that this was thrown out the window, in favor of a spinning ball.

We know modern Scienceβ„’ has been comically wrong about practically every "new discovery" they've made in recent history (bottle of heart-healthy seed oils, anyone?)...

Do you really think they wouldn't go all the way, and overwrite the most sacred ancestral wisdom of all; WHERE we actually live?

Ask yourself why pictures of planets, stars and rocket ships are the very first thing they stuff down our throats in school when we're barely old enough to speak (alongside dinosaurs πŸ‘€).

This is THE linchpin lie that holds it all together.

Nobody can free themselves from the matrix if they don't know who, what, or perhaps most of all WHERE they are.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqtv53fmvl4v4u5vl36jt5kruc07t92z9fvhazag879f77ek959ypqqs8rjanuks0v9xkuyemnglv75mh60kph2v4zp4fu77ss0rv0e0c9qcs47dve

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

What about meteors? They make massive crators and then disappear πŸ˜†πŸ˜…

β€œMeteors”

I follow nostr:nprofile1qqsqqx9hacelkffcgd3ecchzjtlvwq9xn2fmprhrwnzmm2t3exee2eqpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzvuhsz8nhwden5te0dehhxarj94c82c3wwajkcmr0wfjx2u3wdejhgtclzqvdd just in case he finds the door.

The Aliens will pick him up first

They fell on your brain and disappeared into the void.

What scientific discoveries were wrong?

how much time you got

Tell me. Facts not indoctrinatio

You know. Any idea is worth scrutiny, even flat earth. But there is a moment when you see a massive quantity of people repeating the same exact bullshit about things they never understood. Still waiting someone that knows tridimensional trigonometry and is able to show me why the earth should be flat in relation with all the information we have. For the moment I just hear discourses that even a freshman in highschool with a basic physics knowledge could easily prove false or insignificant

Look up Euclidean geometry and come back to me on how that works on a ball earth

I know very well Euclidean geometry. Any little enough part of the surface is almost coincident with a tangent plane. On that plane you apply 2d euclidean geometry quite well.

For a working application is perfect.

Try again. Why aren't you using heliocentric geometry loser?

Tell loser to your mother nasty toddler. There isn't anything called heliocentric geometry. In case it's called polar coordinates. But as you know orbits are not centered on the sun but on the center of gravity of the entire solar system. Plus I was speaking about local measurement on the planet surface. Go to school.

Your claim is we live on a ball which requires heliocentric geometry. Try again loser.

Heliocentric geometry. You are an expert. When did you leave school? Grade 6?

We're talking 5th grade science and you are struggling. How does Euclidean geometry work on a ball? Walk me through it.

I bet you mean Cartesian coordinate system instead of spherical coordinates system. Check your terms and definitions, you look a bit confused.

I can easily convert any function of one system of coordinates into the other. We use the one that comes more handy for calculations, nothing else. Any representation of reality is valid.

I'm not asking for calculations, show practical demonstration of Euclidean geometry on a ball. There is a 7.8m drop every 10km in EVERY direction. How does that work in engineering using Euclidean geometry numbnuts?

There isn't any drop in relation with the center of gravity of the planet. As you move around,.down stays down.

I do not get what engineering project has such a dimension where the curvature of the planet is more significant than the orography of the area.

And.. for for longer distances I suggest you to take a captain license. You will discover they use Spherical Trigonometry.

As you are super thick, in will spell it out to you. How do they take account of the curvature 7.8m per 10km in EVERY direction in engineering, flying on a ball dummy. You know what a ball is?

Yes really we do not understand. We are just the stupid that DO those structures. Tell me a viable example because I do not know what you mean.

Listen you dumb fuck. On your ball model. 10km away, UP is pointing in a different direction - How is that taken into consideration using Euclidean geometry used in Engineering? Level isnt singular on a ball but is used in Engineering... Show me how this is possible on your ball model?

Because it is irrelevant for any structure. When you draw on a paper do you consider the border of the paper or the center of the Galaxy as center for your coordinates? Engineers use any geometry they need..stuff that you do not even know exist. Stop reading stupid stuff around and believing all they write.

If you don't know we also change the settings of scales based on location because earth is not round but an ellipsoid and this changes the distance of the surface from the center plus has different centrifugal forces based on the surface velocity at different latitudes and all this changes the gravitational force depending on the position on the planet that is almost spherical and acts as a spinning ball.

Why aren't you using heliocentric geometry numbnuts? You can't have parallel lines on a ball - Euclids 5th postulate!!! Fuck me you dumb as fuck

Heliocentric geometry does not exists. Is a word you made up.

Anyway has been interesting. People with medium low culture cannot grasp concepts that are too big and probably think engineers operate with middle school math.

Well as a personal satisfaction, due to the fact that I cannot beat you up as we did with stupid in the old times, I hope you will spend a beautiful life 9 to 5, cleaning toilets or turning patties. At least you are not going to be one of the workers around me because you will need something more than middle school math to read my projects. Take care, do not fall of the flat earth... There is Hercules there. Cheers

Spherical geometry cannot have parallel lines. Seek help for your mental illness

Look up hyperspatial geometry and ill explain to you how i can crush an F150 flat with my testicles

The grown ups are talking here. Go back to sleep retard.

We should convince the guy that pretending that we are on a flat surface is not radical enough. He should go on the other side and pretend we are in a Hyperbolic space and relative geometry.

Next your telling us that time is a cube

What if I told you it was a chain of cubes, let's call them blocks

Bro, Egypt.