Yes, it's a big problem.
Strike has the advantage that they can prevent payments to abusuve destinations, but a "non-custodial" taproot assets usd channel would be even more susceptible
Yes, it's a big problem.
Strike has the advantage that they can prevent payments to abusuve destinations, but a "non-custodial" taproot assets usd channel would be even more susceptible
...abusive destinations which are going to be obfuscated by blinded routes I guess, so much fun ahead.
lol yeah good point
I suspect custodians will resist upgrading to pay through blinded paths, that's why stuff like nostr:npub1ufdgkgz3qg4q37taye75hxwal3gq5zl7zjd97ec7gmmja84rdmyspmzcue is important