Oops, in second paragraph should be “zero** trust, highest** stakes”, not “low trust, zero stakes”

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yeah. I think my brain auto-corrected and got the point.

Also, the mere existence of easily accessible self-custody, changes the incentive structures of custodial solutions pretty dramatically, and makes breaches of trust, existential reputational risks.

💯

Not an excuse to not prioritize self-custody as a first class citizen at the protocol layer! But def an important check that I wish people considered when catastrophizing about custodial product usage.

Correct. At TBD, we are prioritizing self-custody solutions.

Love to see it