I know that the Dylan Mulvaney/Bud Light thing was a nothing-burger for most people ( a lot of people reckon it's a piss beer anyway), and for others it was a line in the sand, but the key take away here isn't anything to do with the culture war shit, it's the creepy ESG stuff.

I'm sure you all know now that there is this thing called an 'ESG' score, and companies that do woke shit and climate shit get more access to the money printers, simple as that.

Anheuser-Busch was willing to risk upsetting their customers in order to get closer to the money spigot.

Is that capitalism?

No.

So why are so many people saying things like "capitalism is the problem" and embracing radical socialism, when we clearly don't even have capitalism.

Because it's the old switcheroo. A linguistic sleight of hand.

We don't have capitalism, and yet again and again it's driven into peoples heads that it's the enemy.

They do the same sort of linguistic-linguini with 'Bitcoin' terms.

Bitcoin , crypto, blockchain.

They are interchangeable in the publics mind, there is no difference between them, and the public rarely questions the difference.

It's the same thing with 'capitalism' even though given the degree of centralisation, the system that we live under today is more akin to socialism to begin with.

The money printers decide what the companies do, the allocate resources as they see fit, not the individual.

I have Mulvaney to thank for putting that into sharp relief.

Capitalism = monopoly man bad.

(So don't look behind the curtain).

#Capitalism

#Socialism

#DylanMulvaney

#BudLight

#Beer

#AnheuserBusch

I heard it referred to recently as a 'Command Economy', which I thought was a good term.

Essentially Communism, without the more socialist commitments to the peoples needs.

Seemingly it was Rockefeller, Kissinger & Co who helped China establish the first working model...

Biggest red flag to me over the last few years was when websites like eBay, Amazon, etc, where actively endorsing Black Lives Matter, who were quite clear on their anti-capitalism, pro-communism point of view.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

China was a prototype methinks.

Being pushed to production as we speak.

Awfully coincidental that Boeing gets in to such difficulties, after running a highly successful enterprise, for decades, at precisely the same moment China brings it's first fleet of commercial passenger aircraft to market...

To a casual observer it would appear like western corpos are totally retarded, but all this nonsense has one effect - China profits.

It's the same with the entire ESG/green regs in the west - production of basic goods becomes whoefully more expensive thanks to climat nazis and who profits in the end? Those who bring in containers with everything and anything from China.

It's deliberate.

so-called 'climate policy' is the best expression of this.

why go to war with a nation, when you can just convince it's people to give up the thing that makes them strong and powerful in the first place... ie abundant energy production.

Aye, and China is also the most successfull experiment for national control, probably due to the sheer extend of democide since the global clique put the commies in power.

Destroying/de-industrializing/de-culturing (propbably not a word 😅) the mostly free west is a deliberate policy to that end as it is more resource consuming to control the populations there compared to China. This is done while pretending the Chinese model is somehow superior, naturally ignoring the fact that the biggest market for Chinese products is the west.

A great showcase of controlling both sides while making everyone believe both sides are somehow autonomous.

India is a close second for national control.

Both are testing grounds if you ask me.

Most likely, they are currently #1 in population, if one can even trust the official numbers...

Command economy.

Must remember that.

sounds like they buffed the rust off good old Communism, and gave it a bit of a re-spray...