tell me you never went through the blocksize war without telling me you went through the blocksize war
Discussion
This isn’t about a block size change to mainchain.
No it is not. It is about fundamentally changing miner game theory with urgency yet, ridiculously, WITH NO CLEAR JUSTIFICATION in the spec.
i believe you have been captured by narratives that DC presents GOOD UTILITY THINGS ONLY, and you really need to examine the people that are presenting it that way. The crypto industry is flailing around to justify its existence right now, and the only asset that the SEC says is unequivocally safe is bitcoin. Is it any surprise to you that everyone is now trying to cram every silicon valley shitcoin utility narrative into bitcoin? First ordinals. Now drivechains.
A End-2-encrypted bitcoin sidechain seems very useful to me as way to be traceless from the state and onchain analytic companies. Privacy is true freedom rather than using public ledger for every single transaction.
But it looks like you have already made up your mind.
Apologies for autocorrect:
*end-2-end encrypted sidechain
There is no urgency or rushing.
Only draft BiPs have been presented will take time til final draft is approved. That’s the whole point of btc core review process to do the checks, code audits and balances it’s a time intensive process.
So don’t worry you will be hearing more about drivechain when the final drafts are complete later this year or next year 😆.
