I agree and don’t think they will do FTX shady stuff at all. I do think that reserve requirement’s are unclear by design & are not 1:1. This is fractional reserve BTC territory we’re heading into.

Truly scarce is a problem for them all. Big problem.

If it weren’t, the answer would be as clear as the sun on a beautiful sunny day. But alas, nobody has a clear answer.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I think some will do proof of reserve and provide addresses and such as an incentive to woo certain investors who want that transparency.

Rule for 1 should be rule for all.

I would agree, but seriously don’t care if they hold buckwheat in reserves.

It matters a little. How papery will our beloved BTC become. Very or not much?

There will be a thick ass layer of paper. Already is.

True dat.

well, it would matter if it affected the spot price but it's a derivative and if anyone is stupid enough to confuse the two then ... well...

it's a derivative, ok? it's a derivative, shout it from the towers!

you can have the real thing without any fucking KYC or account or any government approved shiot

ETF = derivative

degree 1, but it's still a derivative

Yes but you missed the point I think. Nobody thinks the customer will own any BTC. Cash-in/cash-out is clear.

Read again for clarity if you want to add.

It is not a derivative

Where do ppl go buy $1M+ of no KYC bitcoin?

People that buy the ETF aren’t buying BTC.

📄 🙌

nostr:note1yjlam6f3jez6nahnhgpdkden8f0d4v7rjks0mynlz5m2t55uexvqnjha5t

That’s right, they are buying the ETF and they know it. They like it

Idk why orange pillers assume high net worth individuals won’t know the difference. I think it’s all just virtue signaling and cope for not stacking hard enough.

I could care less if people sell some of their S&P 500 ETF to buy the bitcoin ETF instead of buying bitcoin itself. They don’t need to value what I value.

🎯