Nostr Web Client

Thinking adversarially is much different than pretending everyone who uses bitcoin will be discovered by the state and arrested. That’s an anxious delusional that will never play out.

But for someone who is anxious and delusional (you) you also choose to ignore the fact that monero can rendered useless by 51% attacks at any time. Monero is never safe from the machinations of intelligence agencies or large institutions. So while it may be better at keeping tx anon it’s MUCH worse than bitcoin overall from a security and longevity standpoint.

Saberhagen The Nameless 4mo ago 💬 3

"Thinking adversarially is much different than pretending everyone who uses a bank account will be censored or frozen. That’s an anxious delusional that will never play out."

Probably also what someone told Satoshi about Bitcoin at some point

Apparently someone hasn't heard of the Samourai, Roman Sterlingov, and Tornado Cash trials going on right now. They don't want you to have privacy bro, that's for a reason that isn't difficult to figure out, it's too late in the game already for you not to understand this.

Youre right a private Bitcoin would be more censorship-resistant than both Bitcoin and Monero.

Great. It's more difficult for the Bitcoin the network to be 51% attacked, but goons with guns can kick down the doors of individual users and coerce them into relinquishing their keys just like the Canadian truckers and BTCSessions friend.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

BTC_P2P 4mo ago 💬 1

One dev is being made an example of. There are millions of Bitcoin user’s in the U.S. alone. The state literally doesn’t have the resources to investigate, prosecute and jail even 1% of people who use Bitcoin, even if they wanted to.

When a person genuinely considers fictional scenarios that are impossible that is a delusion. You are being delusional.

Also, quotes are for something that was actually written or said. When you quote something that wasn’t said that becomes a straw man fallacy. Low iq behavior.

You’ve failed miserably at making coherent and sound arguments. Mostly just fallacious garbage and anxious delusions. I’ve wasted enough time here and won’t reply to any more of your midwittery.

Saberhagen The Nameless 4mo ago 💬 1

You know someone is losing an argument when they resort to constant name-calling and labeling without addressing the core issues.

>"The state literally doesn’t have the resources to investigate, prosecute and jail even 1% of people who use Bitcoin, even if they wanted to."

Ah, so you clearly already understand the concept of making things more difficult to achieve (doesn't require perfection). Take that concept to it's logical conclusion with privacy. You aren't being intellectually honest.

BTC_P2P 4mo ago 💬 1

You are delusional. It’s not name calling, it’s labeling you accurately.

Saberhagen The Nameless 4mo ago 💬 2

Alright you're a dumbass. Just labeling you accurately bro.

Here are a few more "delusional" people

BTC_P2P 4mo ago 💬 1

Lmao name calling!? You must be losing this argument.

I never said Bitcoin’s anonymity features couldn’t be improved. There have already been large improvements in this area since the days of Hal’s tweet, more to come.

Hope you can figure out how to overcome your delusional thought patterns and live in better alignment with reality. Being a scared and delusional man is a sorry place to exist. Best of luck.

Saberhagen The Nameless 4mo ago

A wise man once told me "It’s not name calling, it’s labeling you accurately."

>"There have already been large improvements in this area since the days of Hal’s tweet, more to come."

Lol. Lmao even.

BTC_P2P 4mo ago 💬 1

Such good money 😂😂

Saberhagen The Nameless 4mo ago

More deflection