Nostr Web Client

No, the concept of immigration being part of a solution to mitigating the effects of declining population growth from reduced birth rates is not a conspiracy. I find it unlikely anyone has ever told you it was.

It should be noted the title (or the content) is *not* a reference to the deeply racist “great replacement theory.” (Perhaps this is your confusion?)

Using similar terminology is not the same as being the same idea.

GrumpyGardener 4mo ago 💬 1

The libs are out again.... The terminology is exactly right for exactly what it says. The consequence is what you find racist. The destruction of the native culture and people. It's not even debatable. It's the natural consequence.

But cultures don't matter to those who own tax slaves. One slave is as good as another. Their personal beliefs and culture are of no material consequence to the income they provide.

As for the natives... Those families who suffer murder or rape at the hands of the new slaves, still pay their bills.

Their suffering is also of no material consequence.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Elvis Nuno 3mo ago

Ok… for one: I am not a “lib.” That was a really weird response that didn’t make any response in the context of my comment.

I was simply clarifying that when you have a national population that is *shrinking* due to declining birth rates (people are consciously having no, or fewer, children… that’s just what the statistics show), in order to maintain a workforce and growing economy people need to come from somewhere… so if it’s not coming from procreation, it has to come from immigration.

But if you’re trying to convince yourself, or others, that the “great replacement theory” isn’t something created and amplified exclusively by Aryan nation groups you’re either willfully ignorant, or stupid, or (more likely) both.

Also: no one is trying to minimize, replace, or eliminate your culture. Stop being such a fragile little snowflake. 🙄