If you missed the HBO documentary, I'll save you the time. Most of it is about Bitcoin's history. Here's a part at the end claiming Peter Todd is Satoshi. The documentary outlining Bitcoin's history wasn't bad, but the reveal of nostr:npub1ej493cmun8y9h3082spg5uvt63jgtewneve526g7e2urca2afrxqm3ndrm as Satoshi was dumb.
Discussion
🫡
Hole up, did the director just say the reason Peter Todd, who is Satoshi, chose the name Satoshi is so that he could remain anonymous?!? Lmfaaaaao breaking stuff here boys.
'im an expert at making my coins inaccessible, I done it'
Take a number mofos, not that hard 🤣😂😅😂
WE ARE ALL SATOSHI
Bitcoin OG's look and act like Zionists in the Matrix🫣- especially Adam
The 'investigation' was ridiculous. He basically rounded up a list of suspects and then forced himself to pick one - even after acknowledging early on that Satoshi could just be some anonymous cypherpunk with no trail to a real identity at all - necessarily excluding them from any possible list of suspects. The 'evidence' he found was just an exercise in anomaly hunting - resulting in confirmation bias.