The 'investigation' was ridiculous. He basically rounded up a list of suspects and then forced himself to pick one - even after acknowledging early on that Satoshi could just be some anonymous cypherpunk with no trail to a real identity at all - necessarily excluding them from any possible list of suspects. The 'evidence' he found was just an exercise in anomaly hunting - resulting in confirmation bias.
If you missed the HBO documentary, I'll save you the time. Most of it is about Bitcoin's history. Here's a part at the end claiming Peter Todd is Satoshi. The documentary outlining Bitcoin's history wasn't bad, but the reveal of nostr:npub1ej493cmun8y9h3082spg5uvt63jgtewneve526g7e2urca2afrxqm3ndrm as Satoshi was dumb.
Discussion
No replies yet.