Not it may.
It will. If you check the article you will see that authorities were involved.
There is a huge moral and legal issue. CSAM is just disgusting exploitation of children.
Not it may.
It will. If you check the article you will see that authorities were involved.
There is a huge moral and legal issue. CSAM is just disgusting exploitation of children.
Do you think it makes a difference if these images are embedded in OP_RETURNS, Inscriptions, or fake pubkeys?
Nick Szabo already answered that.
Also the compromised Core devs did not fix inscriptions intentionally.
They are fixed in Bitcoin Knots though which I am running.

Szabo is wrong: If more data is included in the OP_RETURN “bucket”, it *does* in fact mean that less data can fit into the Inscriptions “bucket” since all of it still has to fit within the same block weight limit. (75% less even!)
But you’ve now resorted to outsourcing your thinking again instead of answering my question, so I’ll end the conversation here.
E = mc2, yes I have accepted Einsteins thinking. Great argument.
You or anyone saying that Nicck Szabo is wrong on this issue is dishonest and pathetic.