Clients should default to njump.me or similar when producing a "Share" link as opposed to Snort or whatever

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

This is awesome! Didn't even know this existed

Agree

For the longest time I didn’t understand what that website was 😆

I should maybe update the guide and also see what it’s about.

The use of any domain is problematic as there is no guarantee for these links to work ten years from now or ... tomorrow.

If Snort works fine without being logged in, why not default to snort?

I'm conflicted about what to share to get people join nostr. "Follow me on nostr: npub..." ... people have no idea what to do with that. Sharing my profile link on one of the clients is "wrong" but more accessible. Those who know, know how to find me on their preferred client. The noobs though get a reasonably decent experience. njump is just an indirection.

I was just about to write something similar. Wouldn’t that just centralizing linking and give control to one website operator?

You can one-click open your native client & new users can export other clients. It has social preview & thus can be shared outside of nostr.

Clients currently use Snort because there wasn't a proper portal like njump in the beginning. It's an easy step in the right direction, I'm not advocating for it to be the end goal forever.

cache CDN setting in user preferences maybe?

-export

+explore

i vote for sed editz

s/editz/edits/g

🙌

Thanks for the idea, just implemented "open externally" via njump in my client to view notes and profiles in your browser.