On both sides. It is dishonest to say only core has fault there.
Has i ever said, the core team has also try to explain things.
They could just let it go and keep legit questions without answer.
This drama was not useless, even for the core team.
Discussion
It’s core’s fault since they are the ones refusing to fix the real problem and instead potentially make it worse.
Why weren’t they concerned about “utxo bloat” for the last two years?
So far I am not at all reassured that they do not have other motives
You are true, because they have found this feature useful, to extend usage of this blockchain.
Now it is more clear for them that a lot of people don't want shit on the blockchain.
So it is a more sane situation.
If now that things are clearer they go throw, they know they will lost a lot of node, and it could be a problem.
So a half-middle solution will have to be found.
I don’t negotiate with terrorists
sometimes you don't have choice if you want a solution.
here the solution can't be a war or a chain explosion because some are for and some are against, even in the node owners.
but everyone want the bitcoin blockchain to survive...
It survives by pushing mining decentralization, not encouraging shitcoiners
Then this have to be done.
Even if you need trustable devs to do it the good way to make it happen ?
How can you trust any devs for that ?
How can you said an "new" dev is not here to do a fork or destroy the blockchain ?
It seems public code is not enough for long term vision of what is bitcoin's blockchain and what it have to be used for.
That's why the more devs coding and checking code they are, the better future will be.
https://fountain.fm/episode/Xxa7zWlSZyY3HiW0GYPO
The solution is making the hashers real miners again.
Help big hashers run their own node with DATUM so they can actually help keep Bitcoin secure, and they will benefit from higher profits as well.
All they need to do is run a start9 node with datum set up, and they can solo mine or connect to ocean.
Big pools should encourage their hashers to implement this as well, but the pool operator has no incentive other than the long term health of Bitcoin
"long term health of Bitcoin" is what every one want, except the fiat system and peoples that have too much interest in it.
I don’t know that or trust that. Just because someone talks about Bitcoin you trust them? No I don’t think so.
The network is adversarial and I can only judge peers by their actions.
It is true actions speak louder.
That's why core action "PR merge" will soon be watch by everyone.
They have closed Todd’s PR and they are now pleading and whining trying to get a different PR pushed through that changes the defaults anyway.
Now they have the attention of all nodes owners, so they will have to be careful or they could take a wall.
And i am sure they know that.
Future will said if they are still blind or not.