No but Twitter fixed the algo and I use that for different reasons. I have businesses to run and they are all tools I use as I need.
Discussion
So Elon didnât ruin Twitter after all?
Pete does bitcoin advertising/marketing. He needs the twit.
This is true and Iâm not ashamed of it
Heâs just promoting leftists these days. Let it be.
I donât promote leftists, I have people on my podcast who are from the left and the right, as well as libertarians and anarchists. If you count, we have more from the right than the left but itâs important that we introduce more from the left as they will be the advocates for bitcoin with those on the left.
Thatâs all true. However, you promote leftists and debate the right.
Iâm still simmering in my shame, but Iâll reply anyway. Bitcoin is money for enemies. However, thereâs no need to push enemies into prices they donât deserve. The meme is real and gilding enemies of freedom is counter-productive.
âWe need an equal number of correct and incorrect ideasâ is not the way.
I donât see you (or anyone else) bringing in Saudi princes to talk about using bitcoin to keep banking access away from wives.
Or Russians to talk about undermining the west.
âEnemiesâ generally means âpeople who Iâm not actually afraid of losing toâ. Itâs not a true meme.
Finally, you may counter this argument by saying âthose are part of the rightâ. If so, you reveal the real issue. âThe rightâ contains what you believe to be your actual enemies. There is no limit to what is tolerable to âthe leftâ, but all limits exist to âthe rightâ. That means all of the enemies are to the right.
Ideas are subjective. I bring in people who I think offer value.
Do your true enemies offer value? Mine donât, by my assessment. âBitcoin is money for enemiesâ isnât a justification for what youâre doing. Youâre elevating your allies. Call it what it is.
Echo chambers are fucking boring, please keep having a variety of people on for interesting chat and ignore the whinging đ€
I support this sentiment
Value is subjective. Do what you like with your show. Itâs yours. But donât pretend youâre right when you revert to subjectivity when challenged.
Only if we would be able to justify the terminal cancer of social engineering when driven by intentional ignorance, Iâm sure weâd all be better off, Peter.
You know, like using false pretenses and straight up lies to justify the corruption which feeds false cored social constructs just because it fits the fake narrative.
âItâs judgement that defeats usâ - Kurtz
Then whether ânothingâ is something we can implore and claim just because it was the platform which users defined the science on is considered thieving or just piracy to make the time less offensive, as having targeted and aimed because created an illuminating page, is quite sickening and corrupt, wouldnât you agree, Mark?
What? I donât think we can, but letâs have a plague and war be a party pooper when violating our privacies is paid for by tax dollars.
letâs discuss the effects of user handlers being violated and the viral infections that followed.
Pudding?
#mainvolume be like, yeah thinking is a mainvolume thing.
Versing ainât gonna make real if the faked, big bro.
Peace be with you, Peter.
Bitcoin needs people from all sides to succeed, and it seems Peter is doing what he thinks is the best way to accomplish that. Thatâs cool. As someone who was once a huge Bernie supporter and now canât stand any political party, I have a lot of friends and family who think Iâm insane for promoting bitcoin.
Being a bitcoiner with ideas the left is super hard because then everyone you talk to gives you shit. đ
That also happens if youâre wrong. Having everyone tell you your ideas are stupid sometimes means your ideas are stupid.
I donât think itâs healthy to be a purist. It makes you too susceptible to manipulation.
Do you believe that some ideas are true and some ideas are false?
I believe in engaging people from
where they are and not starting from a point of telling them everything they stand for is stupid. I find thatâs the least effective way to win people over to any position.
Do you think some ideas are right and some ideas are wrong?
Yes, but I wonât get into an hours-long political debate about it. Thatâs not why Iâm here.
Ok cool. Some people are right and others are wrong. đ
I want to hear the ideas of more people who are right. I donât care to hear from people who are wrong. If folks prefer to spend their time listening to people who are wrong thatâs their business.
Since the leftists are the apparent majority on certain communication channels *cough*Reddit*cough*, probably also FB and the bird app (neither of which I use, so I don't know), most likely accelerated by algorithms, orange-pilling the leftists is what would give the most bang for the buck, if the fiat idiom is excused. (Bang for the kSat?)
Bitcoin doesn't care about left or right. Only keys.
Call me crazy. Enriching your enemies to imminentize the eschaton is a bad plan.