So it was all bullshit. Cool, thanks for acknowledging.
Discussion
No but Twitter fixed the algo and I use that for different reasons. I have businesses to run and they are all tools I use as I need.
So Elon didn’t ruin Twitter after all?
Pete does bitcoin advertising/marketing. He needs the twit.
This is true and I’m not ashamed of it
He’s just promoting leftists these days. Let it be.
I don’t promote leftists, I have people on my podcast who are from the left and the right, as well as libertarians and anarchists. If you count, we have more from the right than the left but it’s important that we introduce more from the left as they will be the advocates for bitcoin with those on the left.
That’s all true. However, you promote leftists and debate the right.
I’m still simmering in my shame, but I’ll reply anyway. Bitcoin is money for enemies. However, there’s no need to push enemies into prices they don’t deserve. The meme is real and gilding enemies of freedom is counter-productive.
“We need an equal number of correct and incorrect ideas” is not the way.
I don’t see you (or anyone else) bringing in Saudi princes to talk about using bitcoin to keep banking access away from wives.
Or Russians to talk about undermining the west.
“Enemies” generally means “people who I’m not actually afraid of losing to”. It’s not a true meme.
Finally, you may counter this argument by saying “those are part of the right”. If so, you reveal the real issue. “The right” contains what you believe to be your actual enemies. There is no limit to what is tolerable to “the left”, but all limits exist to “the right”. That means all of the enemies are to the right.
Ideas are subjective. I bring in people who I think offer value.
Do your true enemies offer value? Mine don’t, by my assessment. “Bitcoin is money for enemies” isn’t a justification for what you’re doing. You’re elevating your allies. Call it what it is.
Echo chambers are fucking boring, please keep having a variety of people on for interesting chat and ignore the whinging 🤙
I support this sentiment
Value is subjective. Do what you like with your show. It’s yours. But don’t pretend you’re right when you revert to subjectivity when challenged.
Only if we would be able to justify the terminal cancer of social engineering when driven by intentional ignorance, I’m sure we’d all be better off, Peter.
You know, like using false pretenses and straight up lies to justify the corruption which feeds false cored social constructs just because it fits the fake narrative.
“It’s judgement that defeats us” - Kurtz
Then whether “nothing” is something we can implore and claim just because it was the platform which users defined the science on is considered thieving or just piracy to make the time less offensive, as having targeted and aimed because created an illuminating page, is quite sickening and corrupt, wouldn’t you agree, Mark?
What? I don’t think we can, but let’s have a plague and war be a party pooper when violating our privacies is paid for by tax dollars.
let’s discuss the effects of user handlers being violated and the viral infections that followed.
Pudding?
#mainvolume be like, yeah thinking is a mainvolume thing.
Versing ain’t gonna make real if the faked, big bro.
Peace be with you, Peter.
Bitcoin needs people from all sides to succeed, and it seems Peter is doing what he thinks is the best way to accomplish that. That’s cool. As someone who was once a huge Bernie supporter and now can’t stand any political party, I have a lot of friends and family who think I’m insane for promoting bitcoin.
Being a bitcoiner with ideas the left is super hard because then everyone you talk to gives you shit. 😁
That also happens if you’re wrong. Having everyone tell you your ideas are stupid sometimes means your ideas are stupid.
I don’t think it’s healthy to be a purist. It makes you too susceptible to manipulation.
Do you believe that some ideas are true and some ideas are false?
I believe in engaging people from
where they are and not starting from a point of telling them everything they stand for is stupid. I find that’s the least effective way to win people over to any position.
Do you think some ideas are right and some ideas are wrong?
Yes, but I won’t get into an hours-long political debate about it. That’s not why I’m here.
Ok cool. Some people are right and others are wrong. 👍
I want to hear the ideas of more people who are right. I don’t care to hear from people who are wrong. If folks prefer to spend their time listening to people who are wrong that’s their business.
Since the leftists are the apparent majority on certain communication channels *cough*Reddit*cough*, probably also FB and the bird app (neither of which I use, so I don't know), most likely accelerated by algorithms, orange-pilling the leftists is what would give the most bang for the buck, if the fiat idiom is excused. (Bang for the kSat?)
Bitcoin doesn't care about left or right. Only keys.
Call me crazy. Enriching your enemies to imminentize the eschaton is a bad plan.
Pretty sure you can do better than this 🦦💜
?cid=2154d3d7eg0xufyh7bp7kzbgcydtn2tkctqa32syc5b3xav4&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g