Stalker weirdo
Discussion
So it was all bullshit. Cool, thanks for acknowledging.
No but Twitter fixed the algo and I use that for different reasons. I have businesses to run and they are all tools I use as I need.
So Elon didnāt ruin Twitter after all?
Pete does bitcoin advertising/marketing. He needs the twit.
This is true and Iām not ashamed of it
Heās just promoting leftists these days. Let it be.
I donāt promote leftists, I have people on my podcast who are from the left and the right, as well as libertarians and anarchists. If you count, we have more from the right than the left but itās important that we introduce more from the left as they will be the advocates for bitcoin with those on the left.
Thatās all true. However, you promote leftists and debate the right.
Iām still simmering in my shame, but Iāll reply anyway. Bitcoin is money for enemies. However, thereās no need to push enemies into prices they donāt deserve. The meme is real and gilding enemies of freedom is counter-productive.
āWe need an equal number of correct and incorrect ideasā is not the way.
I donāt see you (or anyone else) bringing in Saudi princes to talk about using bitcoin to keep banking access away from wives.
Or Russians to talk about undermining the west.
āEnemiesā generally means āpeople who Iām not actually afraid of losing toā. Itās not a true meme.
Finally, you may counter this argument by saying āthose are part of the rightā. If so, you reveal the real issue. āThe rightā contains what you believe to be your actual enemies. There is no limit to what is tolerable to āthe leftā, but all limits exist to āthe rightā. That means all of the enemies are to the right.
Ideas are subjective. I bring in people who I think offer value.
Do your true enemies offer value? Mine donāt, by my assessment. āBitcoin is money for enemiesā isnāt a justification for what youāre doing. Youāre elevating your allies. Call it what it is.
Echo chambers are fucking boring, please keep having a variety of people on for interesting chat and ignore the whinging š¤
I support this sentiment
Value is subjective. Do what you like with your show. Itās yours. But donāt pretend youāre right when you revert to subjectivity when challenged.
Only if we would be able to justify the terminal cancer of social engineering when driven by intentional ignorance, Iām sure weād all be better off, Peter.
You know, like using false pretenses and straight up lies to justify the corruption which feeds false cored social constructs just because it fits the fake narrative.
āItās judgement that defeats usā - Kurtz
Then whether ānothingā is something we can implore and claim just because it was the platform which users defined the science on is considered thieving or just piracy to make the time less offensive, as having targeted and aimed because created an illuminating page, is quite sickening and corrupt, wouldnāt you agree, Mark?
What? I donāt think we can, but letās have a plague and war be a party pooper when violating our privacies is paid for by tax dollars.
letās discuss the effects of user handlers being violated and the viral infections that followed.
Pudding?
#mainvolume be like, yeah thinking is a mainvolume thing.
Versing aināt gonna make real if the faked, big bro.
Peace be with you, Peter.
Bitcoin needs people from all sides to succeed, and it seems Peter is doing what he thinks is the best way to accomplish that. Thatās cool. As someone who was once a huge Bernie supporter and now canāt stand any political party, I have a lot of friends and family who think Iām insane for promoting bitcoin.
Being a bitcoiner with ideas the left is super hard because then everyone you talk to gives you shit. š
That also happens if youāre wrong. Having everyone tell you your ideas are stupid sometimes means your ideas are stupid.
I donāt think itās healthy to be a purist. It makes you too susceptible to manipulation.
Do you believe that some ideas are true and some ideas are false?
I believe in engaging people from
where they are and not starting from a point of telling them everything they stand for is stupid. I find thatās the least effective way to win people over to any position.
Do you think some ideas are right and some ideas are wrong?
Yes, but I wonāt get into an hours-long political debate about it. Thatās not why Iām here.
Ok cool. Some people are right and others are wrong. š
I want to hear the ideas of more people who are right. I donāt care to hear from people who are wrong. If folks prefer to spend their time listening to people who are wrong thatās their business.
Since the leftists are the apparent majority on certain communication channels *cough*Reddit*cough*, probably also FB and the bird app (neither of which I use, so I don't know), most likely accelerated by algorithms, orange-pilling the leftists is what would give the most bang for the buck, if the fiat idiom is excused. (Bang for the kSat?)
Bitcoin doesn't care about left or right. Only keys.
Call me crazy. Enriching your enemies to imminentize the eschaton is a bad plan.
Pretty sure you can do better than this š¦¦š
?cid=2154d3d7eg0xufyh7bp7kzbgcydtn2tkctqa32syc5b3xav4&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g