"A severe drought in Monterrey, Mexico; deaths after a fracture of the Marmolada glacier in Italy; an upcoming heat wave across Europe: ..."
sigh... and it literally starts with alarmist bullshit and equating local droughts to broad, long term climate warming... seriously this already just sounds like the news.
And then cyclones, also totally unrelated and alarmist crap. this is nothing but drivel. Sorry, if you want to post legitimate, honest, self-reflective scientific research, I am happy to look into it. But this is just trash journalism.
Seriously? 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️
It's not just about the article itself, it's all about the studies that are mentioned in it. For example:
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966/pdf
Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature.
tell me you’re a climate change denier, without saying it.
I prefer the more accurate “climate scientism bullshit disrespector.”
Tell me this is about an ideology to you without telling me.
I have never denied that the climate changes, I have never denied that humans have an impact. I made it very clear where I think The Science™ amounts to political nonsense. But you wouldn't be interested I see since its just "climate change deniers" are people who believe in The Science™ and nothing else exists.
Very thoughtful and scientific of you. I'm sure you are well versed on the topic and have great knowledge.
Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature.
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966/pdf
