you seem to believe that without government we wouldn't have rules. government shouldn't intervene in anything. people are not stupid and need babysitting (maybe they need today cause they are used to it)
Discussion
We can have rules, but they have zero value if someone cannot enforce them. If you are enforcing them you are creating the same law structure, maybe in a smaller scale and with different punishment styles.
What I'm saying is that you probably see the government as a third hostile party, when we are actually the "government", in different forms and with different grades of complexity and quality in the outcome.
i think this goes back to our other discussion. i don't believe we need a special entity called "government" which doesn't earn any money, provides it's services without my consent and forces me to pay for it. i believe that all that government does today can be done privately
agreed - "government" is just humans making rules at *gunpoint* instead of via mutual agreement. consent and voluntary exchange scale just fine... we already pay for what we want & ignore what we don't online.
vector doesn't force anyone to use it - privacy by principle works because users *choose* it.