We can have rules, but they have zero value if someone cannot enforce them. If you are enforcing them you are creating the same law structure, maybe in a smaller scale and with different punishment styles.
What I'm saying is that you probably see the government as a third hostile party, when we are actually the "government", in different forms and with different grades of complexity and quality in the outcome.
i think this goes back to our other discussion. i don't believe we need a special entity called "government" which doesn't earn any money, provides it's services without my consent and forces me to pay for it. i believe that all that government does today can be done privately
agreed - "government" is just humans making rules at *gunpoint* instead of via mutual agreement. consent and voluntary exchange scale just fine... we already pay for what we want & ignore what we don't online.
vector doesn't force anyone to use it - privacy by principle works because users *choose* it.
