I would love to see you explain how Monero is closer to an NFT than Bitcoin when every Bitcoin has a unique transaction history and Monero doesn't. Bitcoin is the original non-fungible token.
Literally all cypherpunk history disagrees with your dismissal of privacy including Hal Finney.
By putting privacy on the backburner you're less of a digital cash. Not only are you further away from ideal money (by diminishing fungibility i.e. indistinguishable coins), you are also less resistant to adversaries. You open up the possibility of targeted mining censorship and chain analysis on users both which wouldn't be possible if Bitcoin was private.
Moneros original creator is a nym just like Satoshi. It's FOSS and permissionless. So no idea what you are trying to suggest with the "shakes hands with a politician" comment
I never said gold or Monero was perfect. I just see them as tools with different trade offs. You're the only one here calling Bitcoin perfect. Which it is far from being.
Monero and gold supply issuance is predictable, decentralized, and requires PoW just like Bitcoin.
Absolute scarcity doesn't automatically guarantee anything. You have to be honest and contrast it with the full picture of downsides involved with Bitcoin. Merely having absolute scarcity doesn't guarantee value or continued value. You can control supply. You can't control fickle demand (subjective value). Both are required.
Yes, you can't confiscate Bitcoin! Except all those times it has been confiscated of course...and many instances aided by... *drum roll* ...it's lack of privacy!

https://github.com/libbitcoin/libbitcoin-system/wiki/Scarcity-Fallacy
https://www.torekeland.com/roman-sterlingov/





