Working on a manuscript submission to a scientific journal recently. Their website is full of statements about how submissions must adhere to "their principles" of open acces, open source, transparency in funding and conflicts of interest, and on and on.

At the end of all that, they're happy to charge me $4000 USD just for the privilege of hosting my paper and telling me it's "quality research published in their prestigious journal". They do none of the funding, none of the research, none of the peer review, none of the advocacy. They pidgeon-hole me into using expensive, closed-source, soul-sucking software for writing such that institutions literally have no choice but to be captured. They display my work in ways that are no more innovative than print.

The parasitic monopoly of scientific publishing is overripe for disruption by something superior like #nostr.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Sci-hub is great step in the right direction, but it's still downstream of the publishers.

The publishing monopoly still has all the power.

Can you self publish to sci hub? Why not?

Sci-hub isn't so much a "write" platform as it is a "read" platform. Self-publishing these days more often takes the form of depositing pre-prints to things like arxiv/bioarxiv prior to peer-review, and then the journal just scrapes that paper onto their own platform once accepted.

I see now, it is an apparently manually curated torrent of published papers.

Which journal?

I'd prefer to not say for fearing of getting too close to doxxing, but suffice to say in a well-known journal like any other that imposes the exact same fees, conditions and restrictions.

So, not one of those Chinese “paper mill” journals.

lol no, so many shell journals out there, and for very good reason. Everyone sees how grossly profitable it is to be a parasitic publishing house so they want to spin up their own shitcoin journal.

“Shitcoin Journal” is a great name for a magazine.

Wow $4K, that's hughway robbery.... I was trying to publish something a couple years ago in an Open Access journal, and I remember the fees being only around $2K.

Yeah that sounds about right. Journals def milk their perceived prestige and charge accordingly. Publishing in Nature will set you back USD $10,000. It's just completely unhinged.

By perceived I mean the perception of funding agencies and therefore academics trying to get funding. The prestige is entirely fabricated.

nostr:nevent1qqsgtp6lggmmam34yl9pzrwn7hvpnvx8xplsgr2evklc8q9ul3y7mcqpzemhxue69uhkummnw3ex2mrfw3jhxtn0wfnj7q3qtkfex6fd5er9h83299pzxcn699lxdrd3ff3859vhqfm9twtz5leqxpqqqqqqz9kua8w

Wow $10k is bonkers. I mean I guess you're paying for the "prestige" at that point, and I guess if Uncle Sam's footing the bill, "everyone wins"...

It's very rough on the average lab because USD $10,000 is a very steep price that takes a big chunk out of already very thin budgets. So basically they price out most labs and therefore most research.