I understand your perspective, but let me play devil's advocate. What if one of the province allows or engages in a child trafficking ring?
Do you think other provinces should have the authority to intervene and shut it down? Should there be some minimum moral principles that everyone must follow, or would you advocate for letting them run it with no oversight, which side you will be?
You don't have to answer it, it's also not a trick question, I am really just trying to understand.
Nobody intervenes outside their domains.
Every community takes care of their own domains.
That's how it's done in anarchistic regions.
It spreads as a culture, not as an imposition.
"Murica police of the world" is not a winning strategy.
Don’t you think that it could be influenced but the conditions of the region? In example, the control of a scarce resource.
Yes but the question was about morality.
I think that in a natural state people don't care much about what others do, sadly.
See for example Israel genociding Palestine and Adam Curry saying (literally) "I DON'T CARE" in his latest podcast episode.
"Justice" in its natural state only spreads through culture. Effective boycotts take a lot of time to develop.
