I get more annoyed by people who wanting to proudly do self-custody want to run things on their own and be in control but then angrily complain about channel closures by their peers.
I think this is a fundamental chasm in the implied meaning of "self-custody."
Funds? Yes. Payments? No.
Please Login to reply.
…”but I want to be able to close the channel without your consent, but you must not close it. “
I hear you. I'm referring strictly to the base layer conception of self-custody, then applied to LN.
