Nostr

I could imagine the scenario where there are millions of relays and in this case they will be pretty big (bigger than personal/family ones) in this case operators would definitely want to control content. Would you be happy to host a relay where 90% of content is a pure rusian propaganda? Some would want to have personal choice what to host. Others would be forced by laws. Some will want to base content off economic activity

I think if there is a relay where the operator may afford not to care about content at all, it should be extremely small relay. In such case there should be hundreds of millions of relays in existence. Would be great but I can hardly imagine this scenarior

Change this if you want 1y ago

I wish I could have a conversation with you but it’s impossible!

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Viktor Vsk 1y ago

Well, I have my own views developed decades ago mostly and I consider them consistent across different topics/domains and it works for me most of the time.

And the fact that those views contradict views of 90% of loud majority on nostr who speak about social networks but have very limited experience there, only gives me confidence :)

So no worries

Change this if you want 1y ago

No, you just trying to put russia in each conversation that doesn’t make any sense!

Viktor Vsk 1y ago

Well, if you don’t get abstract examples and metaphors sorry for that.

We can put it simpler. If you claim that controlling content is “centralizing” and you don’t understand the mentioned example - I have no other conclusions to make rather than you are going to host a relay, regardless of what content will be stored there.

Looking forward to get an address of this relay.