I can entertain faked Apollo landings. Everything else is weak argumentation. You really think all the highly competitive and high payng jobs at all US aerospace companies like SpaceX are full of dummies and clowns, but you guys know the real truth? Gimme a break. You guy have taken a plausible 70s space race conspiracy and spun it out too far.
While you are at it, keep in mind that:
- the moon missions from the 70s are provably fake
- all the crew who supposedly died in the columbia explosion were found to be alive after it and some still worked at Nasa with their real names
- there are no stars seen in any footage from space
- there's no space or moon footage showing the camera turning 180°+
- there's no footage of the ISS being built
- temperatures in the supposed thermosphere are way hotter than the ISS modules melting points, but it's not an issue because it can't be felt
- even though it's suposed to be in the harshest and most dangerous environment imaginable, there's constant need for EVAs to fix stuff "outside"
- their textile suits have wrinkles at the joints but are supposed to protect people in an absolute vacuum
- due to these, astroNOT death rates are in the high 0.000000% 😆
- the inside of the station has all sorts of stuff sticking out of the walls, but do not fear - it's only the harshest and most dangerous environment imaginable to accidentally pull a line or cable (thankfully all the important stuff is on the outside!)
- they fool around with water/liquids inside the station, but again do not fear, electronics can handle it
- there's plenty of comical indoor ISS footage where it's obvious that "green screen" malarkey is at play, or AR
- there's a giant nasa pool with a fake station where they train for EVAs
- there's EVA footage where one can see bubbles from the astronots, scuba divers in reflections and soft hatch doors
- all of this circus is taxpayer funded for when you think to ask why they would bother. The recent moon "landing" which returned several photos and failed experiments cost at least $110(?) million in taxes
Nothing of this is related to flat earth. Those are all points people should consider, as space programs are funded by taxes.
Finally, appeal to authority or credentials is not a valid argument, only a wall of cope to hide behind when presented with information which triggers cognitive diss.
For some comic relief:
https://odysee.com/@FlatEarthAndCoffee:3/space-bloopers-2nd-edition-109-more:0
Discussion
Buddy, what the hell are you doing with Bitcoin? All those highly-paid economists and experts at the fed and huge private banks are idiots and you know what's up? Gimmi a break.
Appeal to authority or credentials is not a valid argument? Flat or true earth is not a new idea, certainly older than hollywood moon landing productions. The ball is the newer theory and it's just that - a theory. Blindly accepting it as dogma and willfully rejecting evidence of your eyes is just cope from cognitive diss. You can laugh all you want, it's good to feel confident in ignorance I guess.