Explain to me why it's ok to call a Bitcoin wallet "non-custodial" if it's based on Liquid but not ok if it's based on Ecash?
Hint: it's not ok.
Is liquid by its nature more redundant?
If your ecash mint goes down then you are kind of fucked right?
Please Login to reply.
If liquid goes down you're fucked as well. Fedimint has quasi same redundancy properties.
Please explain the quasi reduancy features of fedimint.
Also in comparison of ecash to liquid. Please state why ecash is superior, inferior, or equal in stability and trustworthiness.