To me nostr just exposes a reality that people take for granted: your conversation metadata is not protected pretty much anywhere. We just don’t see it publicly, but twitter, instagram, facebook, etc employees do. Not to mention they can read the contents too and use it to blackmail or throw you in jail one day

So we either solve that or keep repeating the same mistakes and pretend something isn’t fundamentally wrong with our entire society.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yeah but the difference between centralized social medias and nostr is that nostr leaks it to everyone and you don’t even need to have a subpoena for this like in case with the centralized. So it’s basically a honey pot rn! You come and see almost everything including your IP. But yes this should be fixed and be the focus ! Otherwise we are doom

with outbox and nip42 we could sufficiently distribute the metadata, but it would still be subpoenable. Maybe thats a start at least. If noone else will update strfry I will likely have to start hacking on it to add this

gift wraps do not reduce relay-related risk while increasing implementation complexity.

The "implementation complexity" part is the reason I don't implement it. It's not only about the complexity of implementing it once, it's about the future complexity of changing it if it becomes a tech debt.

Personal inbox, or hell even a community relay. With NIP-42.

Anything to prevent companies like Primal from mass-aggregating messages.

Do you think that we can solve delivery and metadata leak in the same time for encrypted messages? If not, which one should we solve first?