the most effective countermeasure is charging for the service and reserving the right to cancel over abusive behaviour

the cost of the abuse is obvious, in the time of admins sifting through this garbage, and how do you put a price on having to see dozens of photos of children being abused or obviously abused children?

whoever is doing it probably thinks they will strike a blow by tainting our data with poison but it's just going to further reinforce the point that me and others have been saying for a long time

this protocol must be self-funded. period.

the funding model where motivations are not guided by pragmatic necessity are not really helping make stuff work, either the funders like opensats need to start tightening up their criteria, setting targets, or stop wasting donors money on funding 20 different versions of the same thing that doesn't solve any real problem.