For events or people that participate in Zap manipulation or reaction manipulation, I do get those events and people being manipulated themselves from being displayed in Trending or Top Zaps.
I am surprised though by some of these additions. Fronl example: Why nostr:npub1ezw0xm0w52rd4yfdg9zlw9qvwdy46alzelklkefptrd203m37tuq4djmeg ? Dude is a nice person and Zaps more than most. I'm attending Riga in part because of him.
Are nostr:npub12z8jsett3k6rv9fa2guau5p540qr2xuvjzkr8e432mglafjt99sqkw9zmx and nostr:npub12jedfuhk2wfr7syr38t2f55652khuyz9f88r63ftm0j2vudxq9sqq7677r listed because they post nudes? So, are these feeds 18+ only then SFW type of content? They may post nudes, but I see Onyx post a lot of beautiful photos too. I would hate to see that content ignored. I'd this is the case, maybe we can ask adult accounts to use NSFW NIP? After several violations then add them to the list? That sounds like a good compromise to me.
On slidestr.net I use hashtags and content warning NIP to identify adult content - I still had to mark some profiles (npubs) as NSFW because that was not reliable enough, when neither is available.
The content warning NIP could be a solution but it has does have some issues....
- As a content creator wants to be visible to users for higher engagement and not be hidden behind a second click.
- It is very subjective what is acceptable and what should hidden behind a content warning.
No replies yet.
