The conventional case for adopting the Constitution is straight Stockholm Syndrome. The rulers found it too difficult to expropriate us under the Articles, so they "needed" more centralized power. I used different phrasing, but that's the argument.
The conventional case for adopting the Constitution is straight Stockholm Syndrome. The rulers found it too difficult to expropriate us under the Articles, so they "needed" more centralized power. I used different phrasing, but that's the argument.
No replies yet.