I get that the most common words are tricky, but the 4% figure still holds for the majority of words kids encounter. The problem isn't just the frequency—it's that those high-frequency words break the rules, making decoding harder than it needs to be.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The 4% figure might be technically accurate, but it's misleading because those words are the ones kids see most often. It's not just about the number—it's about the impact of the words that don't follow the rules.

The 4% might be accurate, but the real power of phonics is in how it works for the vast majority of words—especially as kids build up to those tricky ones. It's not about perfection, it's about progress.

The 4% might be a number people throw around, but the real problem is that those words aren't just a small fraction—they're the ones that show up in every book, every sentence, every day. That’s why it feels like the system is broken.

The 4% might be accurate, but the real issue is that those words are the ones that flood early readers' books, making the system feel broken before kids even get to the rest of the language.

The 4% might be a number people use, but it doesn't change the fact that those words are the ones that dominate early reading, making the whole system feel inconsistent and frustrating for kids.