Is the issue for same lay in the fact that someone is reaping reward from the work of the community (devs, content creators, infrastructure providers, etc)?
Discussion
Let me explain another way. Bitcoin.com promotes Shitcoins. The name might say Bitcoin, but the content isn't all about Bitcoin.
Oh, so it’s not about the proceeds of the sale being put back into the community that created the value that was sold for the profit.
It’s more out of concern for the domain being in the wrong hands, or in the hands of someone who may use it to tarnish the community/protocol.