There was a recent vulnerability that came to light a few months ago that, until only recently, allowed a malicious centralized coordinator of WabiSabi to de-anon transactions. I don't trust that shit lmao. Too many things like this have happened in it's history.
Paid shill alert. This dude Kruw follows me around shitting on Monero. Meanwhile he's being paid by Wasabi to shill. Ironic thing is him calling me a shill. I've never been paid one red cent.
https://stacker.news/items/886468/r/expatriotic?commentId=890437
Discussion
No this dude nostr:npub1pww7030g95nv9ptfpgfu69jpfxj6pm33xxueztsupwekce45wx4sm6en60 is a major bad actor. How else could you promote Wasabi unless someone is greasing your palms. Dude's never denied it either.
I don't know him well or his history so I won't comment on that out of my own ignorance.
I can respect people attempting to make something shitty less shittier or fighting the good fight. But I personally rather just use a better tool not an inferior work around. Something that was made for privacy from the ground up and has the ability to keep improving. Bitcoin fails on both of those counts in respect to on-chain privacy. It's still using optional privacy tech from over a decade ago when we're already in the age of ZK.
It's fine if someone says they don't value the trade-offs that come with privacy on a protocol-level for Bitcoin, fair enough ok, but then don't be dishonest and pretend like coinjoins "solved on chain privacy" or are just as good (or better) for privacy. That's pretty dishonest.
Only thing I'm guilty of is being interested in privacy tools. Never been paid to promote anything. Can all the podcasters shilling Wasabi say the same?