Can we stop counting followers and start focusing on quality of connections?

#weboftrust #my150 #nostrdesign

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

#yestr

Follower count is a lie anyway.

Maybe nostr:npub1ye5ptcxfyyxl5vjvdjar2ua3f0hynkjzpx552mu5snj3qmx5pzjscpknpr can build this into the #WoT stuff he is currently working on? Quality of connection could be determined by number of interactions, at least in part. Also age of connection, realness of peer, etc.

Any additional thoughts from the #SovEng crew? #WebOfTrust

This is an interesting idea. Replace follow count with eigenvector centrality score πŸ€”

Not only that, but rank your own connections using eigencentrality (or similar). I want to glance at my follows and see the most relevant first, where relevant might be a mix of recent, real, frequent, etc.

please leave an option to drive stick. some of us want to make those decisions manually and don’t require ever increasing levels of convenience or feature creep.

Fair. Client diversity and forks of clients will hopefully offer all that. In the end it's filters and should be treated as such.

Lots of existing interfaces got this right imho, from app launchers to (old) reddit's comment filtering (new/top/best/controversial).

Yup, filter UI's are the best benchmarks for this. #progressivedisclosure

Ideally, they wouldn't even be hardcoded and can be discovered (like DVM's).

#WoT is such a good idea, but it needs to be somehow back-uped and implemented widly so it will be reliable information, but i guess this is impossible for open protocol πŸ₯Ή

Nothing is impossible, and there will be a DVM for that.

Welcome to Nostr, where the follower count is made up and the likes don't matter

πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

yes !