A nuclear attack would be the worst outcome. Thats all I'm saying
Feel free to nuke is just a dumb remark
Discussion
russia has been using nuclear threats non stop and achieved some strategic successes by those threats alone, so for how long will you be conceding to these until you are truly and genuinely ready to strike back or even first, how far can they go?
Israel always hit back harder. We all better pray they don't go all the way on this one.
Look, what happened is very serious. In case if you don't comprehend the scale of that single attack: if planned professionally and not mitigated, it would destroy enough military and critical infrastructure targets to literally put Israel into the stone age, causing enormous humanitarian disaster. That Israel fended it off successfully does not mean the intent wasn't to hit it maximally hard.
If they MUST fight, drones against drones is best until one side capitulates.
This is incorrect, the response must be the best available tool for the job, I'm not arguing it should immediately be nuke, but you definitely never should say it's off the table, or you will be taken advantage of.
I'm under the impression that some of your rationalization is coming from the fact you live in Ukraine and current situation means you will justify the most illiberal takes.
Trashy.
it seems like you're suggesting me to just die quietly already and stop making you feel uncomfortable?
You don't seem to understand what the use of a nuke would mean. It would mean the end of civilization. That is the worst possible tool.
But have civilization ended when USA nuked Japan?