Nostr Web Client

I agree with you that monero people are more aligned with this ethos but I have principles and would never condone any shitcoin. 🤙

sommerfeld 2y ago

So your principles seem to be:

1. Bitcoin > shitcoins

2. Actual sovereignty and privacy

by this order.

Not good... You're putting brand names over fundamental values. I would reevaluate

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

noKYC ⚡︎ 2y ago

I would reevaluate if I had monero in my bag 🤣

sommerfeld 2y ago

Well I don't, and still don't let that clout my judgement

noKYC ⚡︎ 2y ago

We are not the same 🤙

B.O.P 2y ago

The fundamentals of Bitcoin is a store of value and a peer to peer electronic cash. There will and are plenty being built on top of it to give it privacy features that make KYC useless.

sommerfeld 2y ago

Have you read the OP? The note was not about monero, just about nokyc.

The guy had to click the profile and investigate just to find something he didn't like. That's SWJing. Bitcoin or monero is besides the point.

If you think the only people worth agreeing to about EVERY topic are bitcoiners, you are retarded.

noKYC ⚡︎ 2y ago

I didn't say that I disagree on the kyc point, but I am free and I share what I think is best. 😴

sommerfeld 2y ago

Of course you are free. By the fact that conditioned your behavior is telling.

Saberhagen The Nameless 2y ago

I don't see "store of value" mentioned anywhere in the white paper. I do see "peer to peer electronic cash".

Any privacy features built on layers on top of Bitcoin so far sacrifice self-custody, permissionlessness, p2p, or final settlement.

Just look at eCash eNuts that just dropped. Not only can they issue unbacked tokens - they literally and metaphorically hold your nuts. I prefer having the option of uncucked privacy, thanks.