Ryan Cristian: "Is there, in your mind, a COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 […]?"

Denis Rancourt, PhD: "Well first of all, all the hypotheses that I put forward and the conclusions that I come to as a scientist are based on hard data. What I mean is I go straight to the mortality. The all-cause mortality I feel is the most reliable data you can have. It's been collected by nations for more than a century. They're legalistically bound to collect this data. It should be of good quality, and you can test the quality by various measures and so on. It's hard data, and that's what I generally have relied on.

"The very first thing is, there is no doubt that there was a lot of mortality way before the vaccines were rolled out. There was excess mortality in large amount before the vaccines were rolled out. […]

"The all-cause mortality, when you look at its temporal and spatial dependence, where this mortality was occurring and as a function of time by day or by week, when you look at that in detail you can demonstrate unambiguously that there was nothing spreading. This was not spreading cause of death or spreading pathogen. There was no spread in the sense of epidemiological beliefs at the moment in mainstream science. OK? There was nothing spreading.

"And that is unambiguous because you get these hotspots of death and the neighboring regions do not experience the same hotspots of death. Their mortality does not increase following those hotspots, and so there's no spread. You can really see very distinct regions of high mortality that stop at a jurisdictional border. It's that simple. You know, county to county in the US, or country to country in Europe, or sub-country region to sub-country region in Europe, they're delimited by these jurisdictional borders.

"In other words, what local governments were doing in their hospital environments, if you like, and what directives were being given, that determined the deaths at the beginning of in 2020, more than anything else. It's very, very clear from these boundaries. […] This is institutions and governments killing people by the measures that they're applying, mostly in hospitals and so on.

[…]

"One of the really important causes of death is severe treatment of elderly and frail people. Isolating them is extremely deadly and removing their usual routine, their usual way that you give them nourishment and also hydrate them and their care that they normally would have. All of that was disrupted tremendously. They were isolated and treated as a danger to themselves, between themselves, and so on. That certainly would have contributed enormously to deaths of the frail people. What was done in care homes and hospitals to elderly and sick people was absolutely horrendous. It was a death machine, basically.

[…]

"The great majority of excess death was all in the elderly and the frail and the sick. The way you killed the elderly was not through the general lockdowns; it was because of how you treated them in their care homes and the hospitals. […]

"You have to think from the perspective of an elderly and frail person who is forced to be in a care home or a hospital and who is subjected to these policies, these measures and these rollouts and you name it. And whose meals and care schedules are being completely disrupted and they're being vaccinated for the flu at the same time. They're being continuously tested. And as soon as they get a positive, whatever that means, they get even more measures put on them and so on. That's what was causing the deaths in terms of all-cause mortality."

Denis Rancourt, PhD with Ryan Cristian @ 05:58–09:03, 11:08–11:55 & 59:44–01:00:50 https://rumble.com/v63gjdn-denis-rancourt-interview-the-covid-19-illusion-biological-stress-induced-ba.html?start=358