nostr:nprofile1qqsx45yrjtgm4glklaafgz0z4309gs6cwfja3d99s8rqvlvgagcptpqprpmhxue69uhhqun9d45h2mfwwpexjmtpdshxuet54gjttu , looks very interesting! A question that has been on my mind from some time… Is nostr:nprofile1qqs2rx4daefmcuwjttl0xegx0guh3tps64fq6dhv3nr56aagw2hhxkgprfmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumm5dpjhyum5w4nxvtnx095sz9mhwden5te0wfjkccte9eekjctdwd68ytnrdaksrr73t8 using NIP-XX-Places from nostr:nprofile1qqsw3mfhnrr0l6ll5zzsrtpeufckv2lazc8k3ru5c3wkjtv8vlwngkspzemhxue69uhkummnw3ex2mrfw3jhxtn0wfnj7qg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t09uhefmkm ? Or are places represented in another form?
I ask, because I can imagine many use cases for ‘places’ but as far as I can see, we have not agreed on a standard yet and that NIP is getting close