Simply not true.

I'd agree with "Most"

Google Perelman, there are many more who do science for the sake of science, not to impress anyone.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Humans are biological creatures. Everything we do relates back to survival and evolutionary fitness in one way shape or form. No one is immune from this biological reality.

Such a HODL goalpost move

Is it tho?

"Every [technology/war/bridge/battle] was all in the hope that a beautiful woman would look at the man who accomplished the feat in this way. Precisely at the moment he entered her."

became

"Everything we do relates back to survival and evolutionary fitness in one way shape or form."

so yes, you absolutely moved the goal post like 100 miles

I’m confused. Do you think sex is somehow not about evolutionary fitness and survival?

No.

I'm saying you jumped from proximate cause to distal cause.

When the above commenter brought up scientists "who do science for the sake of science, not to impress anyone", you were like "oh i didn't mean they were doing it because they themselves were trying to get laid - i only said exactly that, but i didn't mean it."

I get thats what you think I said, but it’s not what I said.

Oh i think i get it now. You're saying the celibate scientists are indeed still just trying to get laid.

So in that case you didn't move the goal posts.

Nice theory and it works in 95% of cases.

Simply saying, that "every" is not true.

Sorry

It do be true