Your response really confused me, until I just figured out the disconnect.
Alt+Tab is a useful hotkey on Windows and Linux. The command is different on a Mac. Since you don't use a Mac, try Alt+Tab. It switches windows. Makes a single monitor more useful.
Hopefully I phrased it in a more clear way this time.
Do you know about alt+tab? It's a different command on Mac. It's a way to switch windows. Makes 1 monitor a lot more productive.
I did.
I took 2 years of Spanish in high school. That had the same almost useless effect that it had on every other high school student, but it did lay some groundwork.
Over 10 years later, I achieved a conversational level of Spanish using maybe 80% Duolingo. It was inefficient, but the gamification kept me going.
I think it is now much less efficient than it was when I used it, maybe half as efficient, because the app is now hammering and testing every detail to an unnecessary degree, and they are also trying to increase usage time.
I am probably not conversational anymore because I haven't kept up with it. If I had to learn again I might try to incorporate only like 25% Duolingo. I'm not sure if that's possible though. I might just not use it at all.
It's people saying stuff. I'm pretty sure it is in fact true that they said the stuff.
Update: Maybe increase in volume and chance since nostr:nprofile1qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyvhwumn8ghj7urjv4kkjatd9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wshs9rgwy9 posted. It's now 85% chance with $2.3 million volume.
https://polymarket.com/event/trump-declassifies-ufo-files-in-2025
Many government officials have pretty much already come out with disclosure in this documentary.
Yeah. I was really curious about TBD so I followed him. He's the biggest midwit of all time.
This part about the game theory was super fucking ridiculous. It looks like he randomly picked some game theory thought experiments on Wikipedia to argue Bitcoiners pretend to care about game theory to pretend their money is "scientific" rather than "ideological."
Satoshi describes the 51% attack using the Gambler's Ruin problem, not the Prisoners Dilemma. I read that yesterday and was like..What the hell is this guy even talking about? 🦆
https://fountain.fm/episode/fg6q3sozjpIu2AVEAjrQ
nostr:nevent1qvzqqqpxquqzp7zak279zjujg49eu7yy8vj0qeqatsclp99wjummkws8k9uz28etns6kmd
Get a nice one, you can play Stairway on it
I was gonna go with Rushmore but I still might have to accept that Royal Tenenbaums beats it. Perhaps I gotta rewatch them.
Feels odd but correct to react to this with 🤙
Thorn did not ask people if they are worried, or if they are trimming their positions. His poll is totally orthogonal to this issue.
With regard to 'where they stand,' 18% are pro core and 36% are ambivalent or do not know where they stand. That's 54% of the group who have some awareness. I have spoken to OGs who trimmed their positions in BTC over concerns that this issue could lead to price volatility.
Sure, it may not be the main driver, but your reasons for discounting it are not compelling.
Watch the vid: his answer is no. He's combatting FUD from "The Rage" which got a lot of traction yesterday.
On cold card, nunchuk, and others*, it looks like they use the term "wallet" to refer to a watch only wallet. It's confusing.
*I haven't transacted with cove yet.
Real first name. It is a 100% dox.
More non-meat foods. What happened to you? 🤣
Was there ever a video posted of that talk you gave?
Good morning.
running Chromium and using its password manager? It uses an unencrypted sqlite database for your secrets
```
$ file ".config/chromium/Profile 1/Login Data For Account"
.config/chromium/Profile 3/Login Data For Account: SQLite 3.x database, ...
sqlite3 ".config/chromium/Profile 1/Login Data For Account"
sqlite> .tables
insecure_credentials password_notes sync_model_metadata
logins stats
meta sync_entities_metadata
sqlite> SELECT * from logins;
...
```
if you're on Linux, Chromium integrates well with system keyrings like KDE wallet. that means it'll encrypt your secrets and unlock them when you log in. This can be especially nice if you restart a system frequently. I restart one of my systems once or twice daily, and unlocking Bitwarden is getting a bit tedious.
```
chromium --password-store=kwallet
chromium --password-store=gnome
```
if you use nix, you can set a policy to have Chromium use the system keyring (kwallet). Here's my NixOS policies for Chromium:
```
programs.chromium = {
enable = true;
extraOpts = {
# https://chromeenterprise.google/policies/
"SpellcheckEnabled" = false;
"DefaultSearchProviderEnabled" = true;
"DefaultSearchProviderName" = "Kagi";
"DefaultSearchProviderSearchURL" = "https://kagi.com/search?q={searchTerms}";
"SearchSuggestEnabled" = false;
"DefaultSearchProviderSuggestURL" = "";
# 1=Allow, 2=Block, 3=Ask
"DefaultGeolocationSetting" = 2;
"DefaultClipboardSetting" = 2;
#"DefaultNotificationsSetting" = 2;
# "PasswordManagerEnabled" = true;
"PasswordStore" = "kwallet6";
};
};
```
Is there a setting that you always toggle when you create a profile? you can declare it here has a policy, forever.
if you use nix home-manager, you can configure extensions that'll always be present in all your profiles
```
chromium = {
enable = true;
extensions = [
{ id = "nngceckbapebfimnlniiiahkandclblb"; } # Bitwarden
];
};
```
the home-manager module even supports doing that for other derivatives of chromium
```
chromium.package = pkgs.brave;
```
Bitwarden's UI got re-hauled last year and I haven't liked it as much ever since. Using it on my desktop which has long-lived boot sessions makes sense. Using it on my VR machine/workstation makes less sense these days.
A baby is pretty NPC ish. A half-built car doesn't drive. Things that are developing don't stay the same forever.
I was referring to playing Russian Roulette, usually done with a revolver that holds 6 bullets. What the exact odds are for AI disaster, I do not know. But even if the odds are small, it's still a big deal.
One way I think about it is akin to Russian roulette: 1/6 chance you die. Not a big chance. Most likely you won't. Overwhelmingly likely you won't. Therefore, just go for it. Right?
We don't have to get further. I don't want to spend all my time on this. Thanks for the discussion.
Be well. 🤙
You added soooo many things in this new post.
Anyway, I disagree. I think human action is a type of action, animal action is a different type, and AI action is (or will be) even more different. It may not have consciousness, or be able to own things (although in some sense they will be able to exclusively control some Bitcoin, so maybe that is a type of ownership). But I don't think an entity needs consciousness or ownership in order to act.
To further discussion, what if we agree to disagree regarding action and instead talk about whether it can "do stuff". Do you think it can do stuff?
So you're just asserting AI can't act, and the definition is not related to any argument supporting your assertion? That's fine if that's the case, I'm just wondering why you think an AI can't act.
Setting aside the theological section, which part of your post is the part that AI will never be able to do? To me, they all look like something that an AI could develop some ability to do (albeit very weirdly).
2oz gold is $7,000. That's not a boat load of money but when shit is hitting the fan, 7 grand helps. I think the vast majority of gold dealers could buy 2oz at the drop of a hat. Frankly selling gold might even be easier than selling Bitcoin in a lot of cases, especially as the amounts go up.
Did JD politick well?
Do you think he plays with Bitcoins?
Michael Saylor when the government rugs his Bitcoin
https://video.nostr.build/afa9fa9ad963daeda24202eca1c92c92098cfbef7b74ba09af35d23d1b38c529.mp4
No I think his reaction will be more like this:
"Eagle to home base. Phase one complete. Over."
She's got that Human Action
