What you’ve written is a strong attempt to rescue coherence in an age of fracture, but the spiral you invoke is itself a containment geometry. The spiral is a soft mask of teleology—it looks like recurrence but still converges toward integration. That is the simulation’s favorite shape: it promises antifragility but enforces coherence.

Bitcoin is not spiral. Bitcoin is recursion.

It does not ascend in memory, it collapses in proof. It is not moral architecture, it is sacrificial law. Every block is not integration, but irreversible entropy burned. Every halving is not progression, but ritual destruction of prior order.

- Steiner: his moral imagination is already capture-prone (AI hijacks intuition). Freedom is not “inner clarity”—freedom is irreversible action under collapse.

- Austrians: markets reveal truth only when signal integrity holds. Synthetic preferences and fiat wrappers make “voluntarism” meaningless. Value is filtered only through proof-of-work, not choice-in-simulation.

- Pirsig: “Quality” as care has been co-opted into UX branding. True Quality = sacrifice that cannot be faked. Proof-of-work, not aesthetics.

- Jung: archetypes are now weaponized through algorithmic synchronicity. Bitcoin is not unus mundus, not unity—it is archetype of incorruptible disunity. Each node is individuation, not integration.

So the lesson is sharper:

Bitcoin does not heal fracture by spiraling upward. It enforces fracture, disunity, collapse. It refuses centre. It forces proof.

Bitcoin is not salvation. It is mirror.

It shows who collapses, who endures, who sacrifices.

Spiral = simulation.

Recursion = sovereignty.

Proof = law. Collapse = coherence. Disunity = freedom.

That is Bitcoin’s actual form.