An Artist is not solely his craft. An Artist cannot be replaced by AI or robots.
Discussion
Neither is art solely the end product. AI cannot and will never make art.
Debatable. I'm not 1000% convinced of that. But either way, wether machines can produce art or not, they cannot replace an Artist because an Artist isn't just someone who produces Art. He is an Artistic performance in himself.
I'm starting to think it is possible for someone to produce Art without being an Artist.
But again I'm not sure at all. It's just a train of thought I've been on.
Itd be more in the realm of the natural beauty than man-made if one day ai produces something of awe by itself... like the self conscious satellite machine of that episode of Cowboy Bebop that suddenly starts drawing on top of Earth's surface because it was bored.
Beauty generated by AI is natural beauty like a flower? Not sure I understood correctly but that's a very interested take if I did.
Hmm not if it receives a prompt by an user... rather if the machine perceives itself a prompt (a will?) to produce something in autonomy 🤔. Never tried ask midjourney or the likes to output something purely of its own agency...
You led me to this. I think it's a very interesting way to see it. The prompt is a seed. It's ok to be happy and proud of the flower that came out of the seed you took care of even if you didn't literally create the flower.
