Pablo! I just finished your podcast. It was so nice to hear you share about your experiences in Argentina, your career thus far, and that you draw inspiration from jack and past leaders such as Seneca. Cheers to Seneca’s quote, “while we wait for life, life passes,” and cheers to you :)
Let me know what you mean by “the game theory of the communications protocol is probably completely different, as information is not as easily containable as fiat money,” and then I’ll attempt to speak to that.
Re: the US Presidential as it relates to technology, AI, bitcoin, etc. People can be certain that the topic of digital currency (it would take constituents amplifying the word Bitcoin for the government to prioritize that word over calling it all Digital Currency) will come into focus this election cycle. The CBDC topic, and any overall want Bitcoin advocacy, would need a public spokesperson in order to drive change. Currently, META has the ear of the Administration;
March 2022 => US Executive Order on Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets => Responsibility of => Office of Science and Technology Policy => OSTP Director => Dr. Arati Prabhakar => Founded 501c3 Actuate => Funded By => Chan Zuckerberg Initiative.
Re: Nostr/Bitcoin: If the ultimate goal is for people to have security of their own assets, and a fair shot at the government not coming down on any entity or individual, there is a need to have mutual understanding with the government. Amplifying some of what you mentioned in your podcast - essentially that protected classes (minorities, women, youth) are the individuals that can benefit most from both systems - is the way to gain mass support.
In terms of what to build for Nostr if the ultimate goal is people having their own security, fiscal or otherwise => people need an abc understanding of how to run their own relay + abc re: lightning.
