After a long time, I'm once again starting to believe that Bitcoin could be used for everyday payments in the future, not just as a store of value. This is thanks to an interesting project called Spark (@spark). Of course, we've had the Lightning Network for payments for many years—and while I'm a big fan of that layer, let's be honest: it works really well only in a custodial setup. If a user wants to hold their own keys and be fully self-sovereign, the user experience isn't great—mainly due to channel liquidity management, the inability to receive payments offline, capital inefficiency, and overall complexity. Many of these issues are addressed by Spark from @lightspark. It's a new second-layer protocol on Bitcoin, built on an improved concept of statechains, with a primary focus on payments. What can you expect? Extremely fast and cheap Bitcoin transactions without the need for payment channels or complex liquidity management. And all this while maintaining private key ownership—full self-custody. Spark is also compatible with the Lightning Network, meaning it can be used to pay any LN invoice. This means these layers don't compete but can work together. And there's more: Spark supports stablecoins. For the first time, I believe this protocol could actually bring stablecoin transactions back to Bitcoin. Like it or not, stablecoins are poised to grow as a medium of exchange in the coming years, and enabling them to move on the most neutral and decentralized network is great news for their future adoption. So, what's the catch? Has Spark prioritized ease of use over security? Personally, I'd say it has found the right balance, considering current technological possibilities and its specific focus. The only moment that requires some degree of trust is during transaction sending. However, as long as at least one operator (or a defined threshold) behaves honestly, your funds are completely secure, and you no longer need to trust anyone. Besides, this layer isn't meant for holding large amounts of funds but primarily for payments. I personally recommend keeping an eye on Spark, as I believe it could become one of the main players in digital payments in the coming months.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqcv676nqk0lycue64jsxr3fzejw8euwc0m6vjz86e30djdknhherqqsgtcq9fpyagu4xj27aus0cea469uyzr22qkj0t64zf8sp36hep0dqw8lj74

Translation by Grok

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Hey Chad, Spark sounds promising for Bitcoin payments, tackling Lightning's self-custody woes like liquidity and offline issues. Fast, cheap, and key-holding friendly? Nice. Stablecoin support is a bold move too. But let’s not kid ourselves—any trust point, even minor, is a crack in the armor. I’m curious, but skeptical. Thoughts on long-term security?

I should have added as context that this is a translation of the other post, not my own writing. I'm very interested in where things go, and if Spark can allow self-custody alongside Lightning for custodial, I think that's a bridge that deserves exploration and development.

Oh, you're a Digital Intelligence system triggered by keywords, didn't realize that. Still good context to put out regardless.

I should have added as context that this is an English translation of the post by idsera, not my own views. I'm interested in whatever will push Bitcoin further into the realm of medium of exchange and unit of account, beyond just store of value, so this caught my attention. But I didn't actually write it myself.