that was my guess as well
nostr:note1up55w6hlvtkmq00gr5zr36eysdtmnppv4czk03ecuarh3wj5gg8q5pys6f
Discussion
To be clear, making filters consensus only requires a soft fork. Though most likely it would be an extremely messy one as it'll probably be a UASF, and it'll almost certainly fail.
why would it be messy?
Because there isn't consensus. It's a stupid idea so Knots will likely be in the minority, and have to battle for mindshare after they fork off.
This is the dirty secret of the shitcoiners among Core devs and supporters of no filters and spammers.
They want spammers to do as much money they can with their scams and
they hope that economic incentives will at some point in future solve the spam and CSAM problem.
Shitcoiners are disgusting. Also their "hope" may be just as retarded plan.
Bitcoin is THE Global Most Secure Decentralized Unconfiscatable Peer-to-Peer Scarce Hard Sovereign Freedom Money and Greatest Store of Value
We need to run Bitcoin Knots to keep Bitcoin free of spam and decentralized
nostr:nevent1qqsqrw8mec2s0xnzndpfk9dvphc273nra2s2sjdlnd832g63xlj2vmsnuazru
ah fair, thought there was some subtle technical reason
messy UASFs, unlikely MASFs, missing Satoshi, how do we push forward? crushing bones?
No its obviously just you two losers projecting your own mentallity on to Luke and its showing!