Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar ₿en Wehrman

Lil quick test using some PNW landmarks I'm familiar with...

(See reference chart of how much drop in elevation we should see due to earth's curvature over certain ground distances.)

Here's a photo of Mt. Rainier from Vancouver B.C. Almost exactly 200 miles distance, which equal 5.05 miles of drop from curvature.

Tippy top of Mt. Rainier is 2.72 miles in height, so on net, from Vancouver B.C., that peak of the summit should be well hidden 2.33 MILES below ground level from the perspective of the photographer.

Yet you can see the BASE of the mountain, essentially bone-flat with Vancouver despite 200 miles of distance. That's mathematically impossible based on the globe model. #FlatEarth

nostr:nevent1qqsfj30ewvjj6k8ecc5tk2nkl9d33h5fqcwpxsj2cefwztkqk6feqpspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygqqrzm7uvlmy5uyxcuuvt3f9lk8qznf4yas3m3hf3da49cunvu4vspsgqqqqqqsnzx3s4

Avatar
Archiesta 10mo ago

I think the globe model is complete BS.

https://rumble.com/v5kj7rf-middle-ground-1-the-copernican-principle.html

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.