Nostr Web Client

Yes, you are just a cartoon frog.

But can you clarify your position? You think relays should all be free and open and accept anything that anyone publishes to them?

Pepe NOSTRos 1y ago

I think relays should be handling encrypted data only and not touch my data. I think that all content controls should be at client. I think that load management and scalability does not require you to look at my data. I think that once the power to censor is created it will be abused. I wish federated identity and notes had been a core design consideration.

None of it matters though. In the end centralizing is easier so that's what will happen.

No hate but I know when a party is winding down. This party promised freedom and is now announcing the curtailing of that freedom for safety and service provider convenience.

Sorry if tone off or typos. Am at beach. I am no ones enemy but I see great danger approaching in familiar garb.

Be well

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

fiatjaf 1y ago

You didn't answer my question.

Pepe NOSTRos 1y ago

Private property governed as described above. I answered the question. You know I did. You are better than playing word games. You could have politely said thank you and walked away or addressed the issues raised as an answer to question. You chose snark. Why?

Pepe NOSTRos 1y ago

You didn't respond to the points in my note jaf

Lucky Kite 1y ago

Tottally agree Pepe. Nostr really should work more like (PgP) email, which was and still is an excellent decentralized communication tool. My local email client controls my spam, I set the terms, not my email provider. It works just fine, I don't want anyone else (eg google) to decide what is or is not for me to receive and read (gmail has been trying to break this system, so I won't use it, Nostr clients/relays must not follow the same path). Spam is a pain, but it does not need to be controlled centrally.