I’m a bit confused. 0xChat doesn’t use @npub, which is not the standard practice.
see this thread? nostr:nevent1qqsys0tx38hmj27mtyase9m6hn5ejlvk8cqgcfvq69mscrhd0vghg0cfuc4lj
0xchat and amethyst are in conflict because both are using the protocol in different ways. Interoperability is already compromised;
Discussion
What do you mean? 0xChat is built on Nostr, and your account is based on your npub. Can you explain a bit more?
Oh, I see what you're saying. I missed the @ in your reply and thought you were referring to to npub in general. Yeah, that's kinda weird. @npub is supported on pretty much every client I've used other than 0xChat. Perhaps they'll add it in a future relase?
the thing, some clients are using it, others are not. so interoperability was compromised by clients implementing non standard features.
It's always frustrating when a client decides to buck the standards in favor of some unique implementation. I wish interoperability was prioritized more often than it is.
What I’m referring to here is the implementation of mentions :). Some clients use @npub, but the standard practice is nostr:npub.