Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar artilekt

"This has nothing to do with the sort of routing that pretty much any other node in the network is doing.

The c= node has an exclusivity deal with CashApp so all their users's payment have to go through c=.

If the CashApp nodes would be open to accept channels from anyone the c= APR would be much lower because their entire operation depends on the special setup.

It's basically a combination of an accounting trick combined with obfuscated fees for the CashApp users.

CashApp could just charge their users a spending fee but instead they do not and split it of to c= which then claims to earn by "routing"." - @bigrouter at SN

Avatar
Guy Swann 7mo ago

Gentry actually said that they explicitly noted the fees for their own users paid directly to them have been removed from the data because it skewed it.

I still haven't seen anything that they published and can't find the session, but hoping to dig in further and verify.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.