hehe now we have a thread for this. I said in the other thread that I disagreed, BUT that referencing it as "bank the unbanked" is perhaps where things go wrong.

Let's say that this unstoppable sly money HAS to be accessible to all. That is a core requirement in its being. All arguments can then fork from that statement...

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

btw if you want people to come over to Nostr, screenshot this sizzling debate, post to Twitter but disallow replies.

Then see if anyone can join Nostr to join the debate!! :D

I don't get it

Accessible to all is anticipated, but not necessarily layer 1.